Measure What Matters
Employee insights with psychological safety built in.
The Problem
You want to understand what is really going on in your organization. Employee satisfaction, psychological safety, culture health. The things that predict whether your best people stay or leave.
But traditional employee surveys get ignored or gamed. People do not trust that responses are truly anonymous. HR sees aggregated scores but misses the real issues. And when problems surface, it is often too late.
The Solution
We design and run employee research with psychological safety as the foundation. Scientifically validated instruments, guaranteed anonymity, and analysis that surfaces patterns leadership needs to see. Not just scores, but insights you can act on.
Honest feedback from your people. And clarity on what to prioritize.
Third-party collection with guaranteed confidentiality
Meet Austrian psychological risk assessment requirements
Pay per study, not per seat. No subscriptions, no running costs.
We find, you run.
We recruit and screen the right participants for your study. You conduct sessions with your own tools — Zoom, Teams, or any platform you prefer. Perfect when you have the expertise but need access to the right people.
Run studies on our platform.
Conduct your research on the Busch Labs platform. Recording, transcription, AI-powered notes and reports — all included in one per-minute price. No subscriptions, no seat licenses.
We handle everything.
Our research experts moderate your sessions, analyze the data, and deliver actionable insights. From study design to final report — full service, no overhead on your team.
Legally compliant psychological risk assessment per Austrian ASchG. Validated methods, actionable insight, full documentation. Busch Labs, Vienna.
Learn moreSurveysMeasure team psychological safety using validated instruments
Learn moreAnalysisAssess organizational culture through surveys and qualitative research
Learn moreRegular engagement surveys and pulse checks for workforce insights
Learn MoreSurveysLegally compliant psychological risk assessment per Austrian ASchG. Validated methods, actionable insight, full documentation. Busch Labs, Vienna.
Learn MoreSurveysMeasure team psychological safety using validated instruments
Learn MoreStrategyDesign and implement comprehensive employee experience programs
Learn MoreStrategyResearch employer brand perception and employee value proposition
Learn MoreAnalysisAssess organizational culture through surveys and qualitative research
Learn MoreThird-party collection ensures employees speak honestly. No fear of retaliation.
We use scientifically validated scales for psychological safety, engagement, and culture.
Compare your results to industry benchmarks. Understand where you stand.
Clear recommendations with prioritized action items. Not just data—decisions.
Experienced moderators for sensitive topics. Culture, conflict, and change.
Meet legal requirements for psychological risk assessment (Evaluierung) in Austria.
From questions to action
We understand your culture challenges, goals, and what decisions you need to inform.
We craft the right methodology—surveys, interviews, or mixed—to answer your questions.
We gather honest feedback with guaranteed anonymity and professional facilitation.
You receive insights with clear recommendations and implementation support.
For comprehensive people programs, employer branding, or multi-site evaluations.
€5,000 – €15,000
€25,000+
Anonymity, compliance, and process details
Our practical guide to research that actually changes products. Free, no strings attached.
Book a call or send us a message
Or reach us directly at marc.busch@user-feedback.at or +43 699 197 101 86
Strategic thinking and practical guidance from our team
The biggest mistake teams make with AI is treating it like a magic black box. Here is a complete, reliable workflow for using LLMs as research assistants while maintaining critical human oversight.
Transform interview transcripts and observation notes into actionable themes through systematic coding. The difference between an opinion and a finding is whether two people agree.
Tools promising 'adaptive AI interviews' often deliver a data nightmare. Why inconsistent probing creates a patchwork of anecdotes instead of a dataset.